Lexington Books
Pages: 220
•
Trim: 6¼ x 9⅜
978-0-7391-9504-8 • Hardback • April 2015 • $117.00 • (£90.00)
978-0-7391-9506-2 • Paperback • April 2019 • $46.99 • (£36.00)
Jane S. Sutton is professor of communication arts and sciences at Penn State York.
Mari Lee Mifsud is associate professor of rhetoric and women, gender, and sexuality studies at the University of Richmond.
Introduction: A Revolution in Tropes, Jane S. Sutton and Mari Lee Mifsud
Chapter 1: Figuring Rhetoric: From Antistrophē to Alloiostrophē, Jane S. Sutton and Mari Lee Mifsud
Chapter 2: The Earth is not at Rest and Neither Should Be Rhetoric, Jane S. Sutton
Chapter 3: Essay as Parataxis: Theorizing Alloiōsis, Marie-Odile N. Hobeika
Chapter 4: Beyond Syntax and Cities at War: Doing History and Theory Alloiostrophically, Mari Lee Mifsud
Chapter 5: An Alloiotrophic Addition, Michele Kennerly
Conclusion: A Chōra Afterword by way of a Fragment and a Riddle, Jane S. Sutton
You’re going to like this book. . . . Not only would this book be useful in a rhetorical theory or a rhetoric and composition class, it can be applied to political theory, comparative literature, and both historiography and history. Finding new ways of engaging difference in a democratic society is both timely and necessary.
— Rhethoric and Public Affairs
“The concept of the trope is easy to summon forth but hard to understand. Jane Sutton and Mari Lee Mifsud have put forward an engaging and inventive examination of this intriguing rhetorical concept. Uniting similarity and enforcing difference, A Revolution in Tropes: Alloiostrophic Rhetoric productively adds to our understanding of what we do when we use language.”
— Scott R. Stroud, University of Texas at Austin
An original advance in the study of rhetorical theory, this book offers fine scholarship on the trope alloiosis. Having discovered this trope and its various definitions in ancient works and on a few lists of tropes over history, Sutton and Mifsud introduce alloiosis with the intent of revolutionizing rhetoric. They explain tropes of change as categorized in four systems: substitution, subtraction, addition, and transposition. The last three are governed by the figure of transmutation, alloiosis being one of transposition. This trope of difference allows rhetoric’s focus to turn from delimited horizons of possibilities to open, ongoing movement toward the unfamiliar and alien and thus invention. Rhetoric, based on Aristotle’s concept of a world at rest, is thus turned toward the concept of a world in flux. The authors argue that with the trope of alloiosis, rhetoric is capable of seeing what is illogical in certain logics about strangers (i.e., others and difference), the strengths of difference, and what has been preventive in the rhetoric of democratic deliberation. Here the authors note the interconnectedness of rhetoric, Earth, and polis. Valuable for those interested in rhetoric, speech, law, philosophy, and communication. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty.
— Choice Reviews
In a time when we question rhetoric’s value in academia and treatment of difference in the public sphere, Jane S. Sutton and Mari Lee Mifsud provide a concise yet theoretically dense text that interrogates rhetoric’s historic roots of excluding difference through our theories of democracy and deliberation.
— Rhetoric Review
"Alloiostrophic Rhetoric is indeed a tropic revolution for rhetorical studies. Sutton and Mifsud provoke the discipline to turn toward difference, to enact a rhetorical choreography that moves in concert with the alien, that embraces radical diversity, and that invites a space for otherness. Returning rhetoric to its tropological force, Sutton and Mifsud make rhetoric rhetorical."
— Michelle Ballif, University of Georgia
“The concept of the trope is easy to summon forth but hard to understand. Jane Sutton and Mari Lee Mifsud have put forward an engaging and inventive examination of this intriguing rhetorical concept. Uniting similarity and enforcing difference, A Revolution in Tropes: Alloiostrophic Rhetoric productively adds to our understanding of what we do when we use language.”
— Scott R. Stroud, University of Texas at Austin
“An original and thought-provoking approach to rhetoric.”
— Maurice Charland, Concordia University